The franc from euro butted.
The franc from euro butted.
World tendencies in currency-financial and political spheres
Convincingly prove,
That during a coming epoch globalizma part delegation
The national sovereignty nadnatsionalnym to bodies becomes
Usual practice not only the developing countries aspiring
To adjoin any economic group, but even
And the advanced, industrial states.
Integration tendencies in the modern world are inevitable. They
Are generated by an amplifying division of labour, specialisation
The states in the international markets, becoming complicated technologies,
Desire of all and everyone to have access to any technical blessings
Civilisations irrespective of, they are made in the given country
Or not.
In this sense any international contract, if any
The country has joined it, undoubtedly restrains the national
The sovereignty. Even the contract on United Nations creation already directly declares,
That the countries-podpisanty are obliged to carry out resolutions General
Assemblies irrespective of, voted they for it or not.
In the world there is a country which has formulated for itself
The principle never in any international organisations not to enter,
- It is Switzerland: not a member of the United Nations, not a member of EU, not a member of the WTO, not a member
The NATO etc. And nevertheless in Switzerland now goes
Fierce discussion between traditsionalistami and supporters
The international integration about joining of the country to an euro zone.
Inertia globalizma lays nobody aside.
Well it or is bad - loss of a part national
The sovereignty? Each country solves this question independently.
The introduction into the United Nations limits pravosposobnost the countries on
To international scene. The accession to WTO imposes on the state
Numerous trading restrictions, depriving of its right
Independently to establish import and export duties.
Participation of the country in NATO deprives of its right to own defensive
To the politician. Association of the West European countries in the currency Union
Zone of euro has deprived of their government of the right to spend the own
Monetary and credit policy. Now it for them does European
The central bank - the exclusive emitter of euro which we is already fast
Let's see in the cash form.
But after all each time, making of this or that decision about
Restriction trading, military, currency-financial or
Any else powers, dared at this state receives
Something in exchange: the voice from a tribune of the United Nations which will hear all
The world; the guaranteed absence of the important conflicts to neighbours (in
NATO or the Warsaw Contract); absence external economic
Troubles from the nearest neighbours, when they after devaluation
The currency receive aggressive and competitive on the another's
Territories export. A similar plot the Western Europe has gone through in
1992, when after easy devaluation of pound sterling 12
The countries in September-November have been compelled devalvirovat the
Currency not to give England unilateral trading advantages.
Very similar Belarus after the Russian crisis worried
1998 when its many traditionally export goods became in
Russia are very expensive.
In the canonical form this plot now develops in
Mutual relations of Brazil and Argentina. After world crisis
Several years ago Brazil strongly devalvirovala the rial,
Having reduced the price of export, and the Argentina peso is chained to dollar
Agreements 1991 on "currency committee". Losses of last in
To trade with Brazil make almost 20 billion dollars
Annually. And not because the Argentina goods are worse, they is simple
Expensive because of the overestimated course of peso.
If the state wishes to get rid of any problems in
The international affairs, it concludes with interested parties
The corresponding contract which, undoubtedly, will restrain it
The national sovereignty, for suverenom in the given question it already
Any more will not be. But there will be no also a problem - military, trading,
Political or currency-financial.
Switzerland, more half a century proud of the "not membership"
Anywhere, the firm franc, and that has been compelled devalvirovat
The franc after gradual devaluation of euro to dollar in
1999-2000. And after all nobody forced it, and currency
Reserves to protect franc at it there is enough. So in what has put? And in
Volume, that by the end of 1999 first of all West European
Tourists (and in Switzerland of 80 percent) have found out them, that for them in
All is very expensive Geneva or Davos, and to it, with their fallen in price
The euro, it became too expensive. The stream of tourists began to thin, hotels
Have started to incur losses. And the Swiss franc quickly devalvirovalsja
Almost after euro.
These problems at Switzerland could and not to be, if it
In time delegated the sovereign powers on carrying out
Own independent credit policy spent
Always strictly in the national interests, any
To the European Central bank. And the European tourists,
The Swiss hotels at all would not notice euro devaluations,
Losses by Switzerland of "the national sovereignty". Questions on that,
Who that loses or gets at achievement of the most different
The international arrangements, each country solves, being conformed
Only with own national interests, and anybody thus
Not asking. In it the original national also consists
The sovereignty - to connect itself only those obligations, which
The country it is valid in something are favourable.
It is literally one of these days the USA left Kiotsky report 1997,
Which imposed on them essential restrictions on emissions in
Atmosphere of hotbed gases. They have decided, that it it is favourable. But
Here 20 years they already there are more threaten to leave the Contract from the USSR about
Restriction of antimissile systems, yes all will not dare in any way it
To make, probably, and it it is favourable. Everyone solves.
Alexander VELICHENKOV.
<$>
//* an information Source: the Russian newspaper, 19.04.01
//* Reg. Nom. - 1110400281.35-------------------------------------------
|
